PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL DAN UKURAN PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HUTANG PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA
Abstract
ABSTRACT. The purpose of this study to analyze the effect of managerial ownership, institutional ownership and firm size of the company's debt policy. The population of this study using the criteria : (1) manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in a row during 2011 to 2013, (2) the company has managerial ownership (managerial ownership) as Director and Commissioner registered as shareholders (shareholders). Based on the criteria of population, it is obtained a total of 39 companies. Sampling was carried out with saturated sampling method that all members of the population is used as a sample. Analysis of the data in this study using multiple regression. The results showed that managerial ownership, institutional ownership significantly and negatively related to debt policy. The size of the company a positive impact on debt policy. In the implementation of the operation , the company should reduce the proportion of debt financing in order to reduce financial distress, because the funding of the company's debts caused financial distress and agency cost is greater than the tax savings from debt interest expense, as a result companies are particularly vulnerable to economic shocks. In addition, the Company should increase firm size so that more have a more stable cash flow which can reduce the risk of the use of debt in order to avoid the risk of bankruptcy in the future .
Keywords : managerial ownership , institutional ownership , firm size ,and debt policyÂ
References
Bathala, C.T., Moon, K.P., dan Rao, R.P. 1994. Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy, and the Impacts of Institutional Holding: An Agency Perspective. Financial Management. Vol. 23, No. 3, P. 28-50.
Brigham, E.F., dan Weston, J.F. 1990. Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi Kesembilan. Erlangga: Jakarta.
Cruthley, C.E., dan Robert, S.H. 1989. A Test of Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends. Financial Management. Vol. 18, P. 36-46.
Fadah, I., dan Novi, R.A. 2008. Interdependensi Kebijakan Dividen, Kebijakan Hutang dan Kepemilikan Manajerial: Perspektif Teori Keagenan. National Conference on Management Research. P.1-18.
Friend, I., dan Lang, H.P. 1988. An Empirical Test of The Impact of Managerial Self-interest on Corporate Capital Structureî. Journal of Finance. Vol. 43, P. 271-282.
Grief, P., dan Zychowicz, E. 1994. Institutional Investors, Coporate Discipline, and The Role of Debt. Journal of Economics and Business. Vol. 46, P. 1-11.
Hardiningsih, P., dan Oktaviani, M.O. 2012. Determinan Kebijakan Hutang (Dalam Agency Teory dan Pecking Order Teory). ISSN :1779-4878. Vol. 1, P. 11-24.
Homaifar, G., Zietz, J., Benkato, A. 1994. An Empirical Model of Capital Structure: Some New Evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. Vol. 21, Issue. 1, P. 1-14.
Indahningrum, R.P., dan Handayani, R. 2009. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, Dividen, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Free Cash Flow dan Profitabilitas terhadap Kebijakan Hutang. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Vol. 11, No. 3, P. 189-207.
Jensen, G.R., Solberg, D.P., dan Zorn, T.S. 1992. Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Vol. 27, P. 247-263.
Junaidi. 2006. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial dan Kepemilikan Institusional terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan: Sebuah Perspektif Agency Theory dengan Variabel Kontrol Dividend Payout Ratio, Ukuran Perusahaan, Assets Structure, dan Risiko Bisnis. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya.
Kim, W.S., dan Sorensen, E.H. 1986. Evidence on the Impact of the Agency Costs of Debt on Corporate Debt Policy. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Vol. 21, No. 2, P. 131-144.
Lopez, J., dan Sogorb, F. 2008. Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories Financing SMEs. Small Business Economics. Vol. 31, Issue. 2, P. 117-136.
Megginson, W.L. 1997. Corporate Finance Theory. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
Moh’d, M.A., Perry, L.G., dan Rimbey, J.N. 1998. The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Debt Policy: A Time-Series Cross-Sectional Analysis. The Financial Review. Vol. 33, P. 85-98.
Nuraina, E. 2012. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang dan Nilai Perusahaan (Studi pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI). Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi (JBE). Vol. 19, No. 19, P. 110-125.
Putri, I.F., dan Nasir, M. 2006. Analisis Persaman Simultan Kepemilkan Manajerial, Kepemilkan Instiusional, Risiko, Kebijakan Hutang dan Kebijakan Dividen Dalam Perspektif Teori Keagenan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
Shaheen, S., dan Malik, Q.A. 2012. The Impact of Capital Intensity, Size of Firm And Profitability on Debt Financing In Textile Industry of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. Vol. 3, No. 10.
Steven dan Lina. 2011. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Vol. 13, No. 3, Desember, 163-181.
Sujoko, dan Subiantoro, U. 2007. Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilkan Saham, Leverage, Faktor Intern dan Faktor Ekstern terhadap Nilai Perusahan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahan. Vol. 9, No. 1, P. 41-48.
Surya, D., dan Rahayuningsih, D.A. 2012. Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan Non Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis & Akuntansi. Vol. 14, No..3.
Yeniatie, dan Destriana, N. 2010. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang pada Perusahaan Non-Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Vol. 12, No. 1, P. 1-16.
eMBJi: Manajemen dan Bisnis Jurnal
by http://mbj.wisnuwardhana.ac.id/index.php/mbj
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
